[EN] Hiding of information

In the last weeks some news appeared on alternative media that I consider important sharing. The first is about a review [1] of the paper [2][3] that gave room to the pandemic today is declared worldwide. Together with this review also a letter was sent [4] requesting the original paper be retracted because of the grave errors it contains as well as the shady situations around it, for instance: - that it was reviewed in a single day when reviews take a lot more of time - that they refuse to share its review - that two authors of that paper are members editorial board of the journal publishing the paper - that at least four authors have conflicts of interests - that the WHO published the paper ten days before it was published by the journal This is the paper of Christian Drosten (amongst others). This scientist is known virologist, that even if not many remember, was already involved in another pandemic, the swine flu of 2009, in which also played an important role. Of his recommendations the most important one was that the population should let be vaccinated [5]. The adverse effect of this vaccine, known as Pandemrix, was the high risk of narcolepsy [6][7][8]. In Germany, the population refused the vaccine as they learned that the politicians were to get a different vaccine, namely the vaccine without the adjuvant [9]. At that time the German government also invested 1.000.000.000 euros [10] in the development of the vaccine, which not only was not necessary but also dangerous [6][7][8]. Another interesting analysis of the paper of Drosten [2][3] was published on “off-guardian.org” [26]. Back to the scientist Drosten, this person is talking since some years ago about a possible coronavirus pandemic [11]. It seems he is known for developing tests in record time [12]. That time, he was also involved in tests and he also developed tests without virus samples. I find very striking how this person is always involved in such matters and even after making grave mistakes he is still relevant and credible. Clearly, the government and more than one institution have interest that go beyond the wellbeing of the population, otherwise this person would not be an adviser since a long time. I also find interesting how, depending on if it benefits him, he says the PCR are very sensible and could be positive with mild symptoms or no symptoms for people that are completely healthy and the media stirs a lot of uneasiness in the population as well as doctors , when they talk about outbreaks [13]. As of today, Drosten refers to what happened that pandemic of 2009 simply as an estimation error [14] and tries to explain that the population was not going to get a worse vaccine intentionally but because of production capacity issues, casually, for the politicians a vaccine without adjuvant was going to be delivered, a very opportunistic coincidence. Seemingly the responsibility of what one does and say only goes for the layman. The experts have the right and freedom to make mistakes without being later questioned or losing credibility. Another example of scientists, that no matter how many mistakes they make, somehow, they are still being heard is Neil Ferguson. This person, even after the fiasco surrounding him [15] had a position as adviser of the British government, which he quit after it was made public that he himself did not respect the restrictive measures imposed by the government [16]. No matter how polemic a scientist is, as long as he is surrounded by the right people, will never lose credibility. The Nature journal dedicate articles to his untrustworthy mathematic model [17], which was analyzed [18] by a programmer with thirty years of experience. This scientist was a hero [19] even before the supposed pandemic is over. The second news is a “class action” [20] initiated by a group of lawyers based in Germany and the United States against the scientist Christian Drosten for developing a defective test knowing that it cannot be used to detect infections and against the WHO for recommending the use of such test to detect the illness. Specifically, what is it about you can hear it from the lawyer himself, Reiner Füllmich, who carries this process forward, the contents are in various languages, English [21], Spanish [22], French [23] and German [24], amongst others. Many of these videos get censored and/or deleted in Youtube, but they can be found on other platforms. In a few words, if the test developed by Christian Drosten is so defective as the scientists that analyzed it say it is, the pandemic is not based on science and by demonstrating that the test does not meet the corresponding requirements, then it cannot be used to reliably detect the virus and all restrictive measures would lose all lawful base and must be lifted. If it were like that, scientists and doctors could finally focus on treating patients adequately and look for solutions without impediments, instead of being threatened with losing their license or job if they do not comply with the recommendations of the WHO and the rules the governments set based on these recommendations. As usual today, much information about these topics do not circulate the mass media or official media. Most probably, they are trying to hide it as much possible. I could find at least one interview in a newspaper made to the lawyer [25]. One could ask himself, why hide this type of information? Would not be information like this helpful and beneficial? It might sound like a conspiracy theory and may lack basis, but the result of this going public is pressure on governments to clarify this, possible lifting of restrictive measures, total loss of population’s trust in their representatives and organizations like the WHO, unimaginable economic compensations, total refusal to be vaccinated, amongst others. If really all of this were to be a farce and done intentionally, then they will hide it till the end.

Federico Eduardo Ferraris Sánchez

12/12/2020

1- Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020, https://bit.ly/37bO2Ns (English), https://bit.ly/3465Mb7 (Spanish)

2- Retraction request letter to Eurosurveillance editorial board https://bit.ly/3gG8lWq

3- Original paper in Eurosurveillance https://bit.ly/3oM8nim

4- Original paper in NCBI https://bit.ly/3qS2bHu

5- Drosten asks population to let be vaccinated https://bit.ly/378LdwO

6- WHO on narcolepsy and vaccination https://bit.ly/3ncASFP

7- CDC on narcolepsy and vaccination https://bit.ly/3oLrLfE

8- Sciencemag on narcolepsy and vaccination https://bit.ly/3gNhFrJ

9- Population upset because of “two classes vaccination” https://bit.ly/3oLQ4tP

10- The government invests thousand million euros in swine flu vaccine https://bit.ly/3gDy4z0

11- Drosten predicts bat flu https://bit.ly/2JP873C

12- Drosten develops tests in record time https://bit.ly/3qRWycw

13- Drosten about tests’ sensibleness and the media’s role https://bit.ly/3a3WsZb

14- Drosten and the estimation error of the swine flu pandemic https://bit.ly/2LwF5Gj

15- Neil Ferguson’s fiasco https://bit.ly/2KgVBtm

16- Neil Ferguson quits as government’s adviser https://bbc.in/3maf7oB

17- Nature journal on Ferguson’s model https://go.nature.com/3ndwPJ3

18- Analysis of the code of Ferguson’s model https://bit.ly/3gIapxl

19- Ferguson the hero https://bit.ly/348TWgv

20- Official site “class action” https://bit.ly/2WbcPuN

21- Video about the “class action” in English https://bit.ly/3qY8NEz

22- Video about the “class action” in Spanish https://bit.ly/3gEO8jO

23- Video about the “class action” in French https://bit.ly/3njxt8g

24- Video about the “class action” in German https://bit.ly/3qLUt1P

25- Reiner Füllmich’s Interview https://bit.ly/37eB3ed

26- Another analysis of the original paper https://bit.ly/2W5GVA2

PDF Version:

Post 3 - Hiding of information.pdf

PDF herunterladen • 158KB